The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) designed to be a comprehensive assessment of physical. The FAAM is a self-report measure that assesses physical function of individuals with lower leg, foot, and ankle Patient Reported Outcomes. The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) is a region-specific, non–disease- specific outcome instrument that possesses many of the clinimetric qualities.
|Published (Last):||12 June 2006|
|PDF File Size:||6.78 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.16 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Physiopedia articles are best used to find the original sources of information see the references list at the bottom of the article. The daam clinically important differences were 8 and 9 points for the ADL and Sports subscales, respectively.
The objective of this study was to develop an instrument to meet this need: Validation of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score for ankle ligament reconstruction. Content validity The specific items on the instrument and what they measure determine the evidence that is based on content.
Construct validity While evidence for content relates directly to what the items measure, evidence for construct validity assesses how the scores on the instrument relate to other measures of the construct. The Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool: Each potential participant completed the screening questionnaire and provided a medical history.
Free online Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) score calculator
Likewise, differences in mean scores between groups were greater on the sports subscale 23 points than on the ADL subscale 12 points.
The sports subscale may be particularly useful when addressing the limitations of athletes with CAI. That is usually the journal article where the information was first stated.
The final version of outco,e FAAM consists of the item activities of daily living ADL and 8-item Sports subscales, which together produced information across the spectrum ability. Therefore, although they may score high on the Otucome items of the FAAM, they may rate global function lower because of their limitation in sports. Scores on the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure activities of daily living and sports subscales were greater in healthy athletes than in those with chronic ankle ouutcome and were greater in the athletes who indicated that their ankles were normal than in outclme who indicated that their ankles were nearly normal or abnormal.
We analyzed our data with SPSS version Jeasure on the sports subscale of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure and on the sports global rating of function had a strong relationship.
Because only 1 athlete indicated that the ankle was abnormaldata from the nearly normal and abnormal groups were pooled. Guyatt responsive index and ROC analysis found the ADL subscale was more responsive than general measures of physical function while the Sports subscale was not. Evaluative instruments are designed to measure an individual’s change in status over time, thereby assessing the effectiveness and outcome of treatment.
Open in a separate window.
The screening questionnaire consisted of 19 questions related to frequency and severity of previous ankle sprains. The score on each of the items are added together to get the item score total. The same investigator J. A survey of self-reported outcome instruments for the foot and ankle.
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure
Hypothesis testing is used to determine if the instrument performs as expected and is a faamm that is capable of providing evidence for construct validity. Therefore, we recommend that when administering the FAAM, clinicians should ascertain both measures. The number of items with a response is multiplied by 4 to get the highest potential score.
This information suggests that these athletes were functioning at high levels.
Validity of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure in Athletes With Chronic Ankle Instability
Scoring instructions for the FAAM. Injuries in team sport tournaments during the Olympic Games. Patients or Other Participants: In a systematic review of the literature, Eechaute et al 5 identified evaluative instruments for individuals with CAI and evidence to support their use. Original Editors – Niels Verbeeck. The total number of items with a response is multiplied by 4 to get the highest potential score.
Biomechanics of the unstable ankle joint and clinical implications [abstract]. These results suggest that although the measures are related, they appear to capture unique information. Information acquired from an evaluative instrument is useful only if evidence is available to support the interpretation of scores obtained in the specific population in which the instrument is intended to be used. As anticipated, athletes who rated their ankles as normal scored higher than those who scored their ankles as anything less than normal.
This value is then multiplied by to get a percentage.
Anandacoomarasamy A, Barnsley L. Support Center Support Center. The content on or accessible through Physiopedia is for informational purposes only. If you believe that this Physiopedia article is the primary source for the information you are refering to, you can use the button below to access a related citation statement.
Final item reduction was completed using item response theory with subjects. We did not monitor these athletes over time following an intervention to capture data related to the instrument’s reliability and responsiveness, including the minimal detectable change and the minimal clinically important difference.
The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure is a item questionnaire divided into two subscales: J Bone Joint Surg Br.